Democrat Xavier Becerra has officially secured a spot in the November general election for California governor, complete with a projection from major networks that caps an unexpected political resurrection. For months, the former U.S. Health and Human Services Secretary and state Attorney General was a ghost in the polls, languishing in the low single digits while a crowded field of high-profile Democrats fought to succeed the term-limited Gavin Newsom. Yet, when the Associated Press called the race, Becerra had climbed to the top spot with nearly 27 percent of the vote.
The standard political narrative frames this as a classic underdog story, a triumph of institutional experience over flashier rivals. That narrative is wrong.
Becerra did not win because of a sudden groundswell of grassroots enthusiasm. He won because the California Democratic machine broke down, a frontrunner’s career imploded in scandal, and panicked establishment donors needed a safe, predictable vessel to avoid an unprecedented electoral disaster. Now, as election officials finish tallying more than three million uncounted ballots, the state faces two wildly divergent paths for the fall.
If the current second-place holder, Trump-endorsed Republican and former Fox News commentator Steve Hilton, holds his narrow lead, Becerra will enter the general election as an overwhelming favorite in a state where registered Democrats outnumber Republicans nearly two-to-one. But if billionaire climate activist Tom Steyer—who poured a staggering $215 million of his personal fortune into the race—manages to close the gap as late-mail ballots are processed, California will witness a brutal, intra-party civil war that could fundamentally reshape the state’s political identity.
The Implosion That Scrambled the Race
To understand how Becerra went from polling at a dismal 3 percent in April to leading the state in June, one must look at the structural collapse of his competition.
For the first half of the campaign, Representative Eric Swalwell had successfully consolidated the center-left and establishment wings of the party. He possessed the national name recognition, the aggressive anti-Trump rhetoric that fires up the California base, and the fundraising network required to blanket the state’s expensive media markets.
Then came April. Multiple allegations of sexual assault and misconduct surfaced against Swalwell. While he denied the accusations, the political damage was instantaneous and total. Within days, Swalwell suspended his gubernatorial campaign and resigned from Congress, leaving a massive power vacuum and millions of voters suddenly unmoored.
Had Swalwell stayed in the race, Becerra’s campaign would likely be a footnote. Instead, panicked party leaders, labor unions, and moderate Democratic donors looked at the remaining field and saw a nightmare scenario under California’s jungle primary system.
Under these rules, the top two vote-getters advance to November regardless of party. With a dozen viable Democrats splitting the progressive and moderate vote, the party faced a genuine risk of cannibalizing itself. If the Democratic vote fractured too cleanly, two Republicans—Hilton and Riverside County Sheriff Chad Bianco—could have slipped into the top two spots, locking Democrats out of the governor's mansion for the first time since Arnold Schwarzenegger left office.
Becerra became the beneficiary of pure political survival instinct. He was mild-mannered, deeply experienced, and critically, he carried very little fresh baggage. He was the only candidate left who could serve as an immediate, stabilizing alternative for the party's institutional wing.
The Illusion of the Progressive Mandate
During his victory speech, Becerra leaned heavily into populist rhetoric, declaring that the voters of California "will not be bought" and "will not be bullied." It was a direct swipe at Steyer’s historic spending and Trump’s endorsement of Hilton.
But a closer look at Becerra’s record reveals a candidate who is far more aligned with the corporate status quo than his recent campaign trail rhetoric suggests. While Steyer ran a campaign focused on structural overhauls, wealth taxes on billionaires, and single-payer healthcare, Becerra’s platform is notably cautious.
He has promised a state of emergency to freeze utility and home insurance rates—a popular talking point in a state plagued by soaring living costs. However, industry insiders know that a temporary freeze does nothing to address the underlying crisis of wildfire risk and state regulatory failures that drove major insurers out of California in the first place.
Furthermore, despite his past national policy positions, Becerra has quietly signaled to business groups that he is willing to slow down the state’s aggressive greenhouse gas reduction mandates. It is a pragmatic nod to working-class voters frustrated by highest-in-the-nation gas prices, but it represents a significant retreat from the climate-pioneer mantle California has worn for two decades.
On the defining issue of homelessness, which has worsened considerably over the last eight years, Becerra offered a telling assessment during a primary debate. He gave Governor Gavin Newsom an "A for effort." To the hundreds of thousands of residents living near encampments in Los Angeles, San Francisco, and Sacramento, that grade feels less like objective evaluation and more like a promise to protect the political establishment from accountability.
The Fall Scenarios and the Threat of the Late Count
The drama of the primary is over, but the finality of the November matchup remains stuck in California's notoriously slow counting process. The state accepts mail-in ballots that arrive up to a week after Election Day, provided they are postmarked on time. Historically, these late ballots tilt heavily toward registered Democrats.
This delay has already triggered a national political skirmish. Donald Trump took to social media to prematurely declare Steve Hilton the runner-up and launch baseless accusations of election fraud against California officials.
For Hilton, a British-born former political strategist for David Cameron turned American conservative pundit, surviving the count is everything. If Hilton holds off Steyer, the general election becomes an ideological mismatch. Hilton’s platform of slashing regulations, cutting taxes, and dismantling state bureaucracies appeals deeply to the state's conservative enclaves in the Central Valley and Orange County. But a Trump-endorsed Republican faces a nearly insurmountable math problem in a statewide general election here.
The real anxiety within the Democratic establishment centers on Tom Steyer. If the uncounted mail-in ballots lift the billionaire activist into second place, the general election will not be a rubber-stamp exercise for the party.
A Becerra-Steyer matchup would force a raw, expensive, and deeply divisive debate over the future of the Democratic Party. Steyer has the resources to fund a parallel campaign apparatus that completely bypasses traditional party control. He would force Becerra to defend the record of the current administration on housing, crime, and economic inequality from the left, stripping away the benefit of a unified party front.
The establishment wanted a safe, quiet path to the governor's mansion. Xavier Becerra gave them the safety, but the final tally will determine whether they get any peace.
.jpg)
